Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Polyxena: A Slave to Patriarchy

For my figurative analysis I have chosen to focus on Euripides’s Greek tragedy Hecuba, specifically the first agon of Polyxena’s sacrificial death. Talthybius, herald of Agamemnon, recounts Polyxena’s death to her faint-hearted mother, Hecuba. Zeroing in on the scene of sacrifice, patriarchal themes play a much larger role than mere undertones.
Polyxena appears to escape her fate as a slave in accepting her sacrificial death, yet her death tragically proves she has always been a slave. While held down by Argive warriors over Achilles’ tomb, Polyxena utters, "O Argives, who have sacked my city! of my free will I die; let none lay hand on me; for bravely will I yield my neck. Leave me free, I do beseech; so slay me, that death may find me free; for to be called a slave amongst the dead fills my royal heart with shame." In so “bravely” accepting her sacrificial virgin death, she demonstrates the deeply ingrained nature of female subjugation in a male dominated society. Polyxena’s obliviousness to the reality of her status, only further demonstrates the deceptive strength of patriarchy. Additionally, Achilles’ son leads the sacrifice offering his dead father “the black blood of a virgin pure” to appease his spirit from bringing on a disastrous storm. In order to appease and honor the patriarchal figure, an animal is not sacrificed, but rather a virgin woman. The death of women quite literally perpetuates patriarchy.
Once unrestrained, Polyxena rips open her robe from shoulder to waist, exposing her breasts; the objectified symbol of femininity. Polyxena goes on to piteously say, "Young prince, if 'tis my breast thou'dst strike, lo! here it is, strike home! or if at my neck thy sword thou'lt aim, behold! that neck is bared." Interestingly, instead of striking her breasts, Achilles’ son uses his golden sword, a phallic symbol of patriarchal hierarchy, to penetrate Polyxena’s throat to complete the virgin sacrifice; a metaphorical devirgination. Polyxena’s neck and breath signify her livelihood as well as her ability to speak. In order to emphasize the silencing of women, the female form remains intact. Furthermore, Polyxena’s fatal wound foreshadows her own mother’s feral fate of losing her ability to speak.  But unlike her mother, Polyxena has chosen to silence herself. In a patriarchy, women have no glory from words and deeds.
Even in phallic fatality, Talthybius notes that Polyxena “took good heed to fall with maiden grace, hiding from gaze of man what modest maiden must.” The alliteration draws attention to the rigid expectations of women’s modesty in a patriarchal society; even in the final moments of death it is unacceptable for a woman to accidentally show her vagina in the presence of men. Ironically, Polyxena must hide from sight the very reason she was chosen as the virgin sacrifice. As soon as Polyxena breathed her final breath, the Argive warriors were tasked with covering her corpse. Those who were not helpful were scolded, “Stand’st thou still, ignoble wretch, with never a robe or ornament to bring for the maiden?” Even as a corpse, Polyxena’s body needed to remain not only covered, but also decorated.
Through the use of metaphorical and symbolic phallic imagery, modest irony, and attention grabbing alliteration, Polyxena’s sacrificial virgin death is not simply an offering to Achilles, but an offering to the patriarchy. The death, silencing, and objectification of women strengthen the patriarchal institution and perpetuate its values.

Saturday, September 17, 2016

The Precis and the Figurative Reading

As promised this Thursday, I am posting a brief but more detailed description of the two short 2-3pp. written assignments required for this course in addition to the longer final paper (which you don't really have to worry about yet) and the notebook and participation/attendance requirements (which you have already been doing all along -- I sincerely hope). One of the short writing assignments is to be a precis of an argument in one of our assigned texts and the other is a figurative reading of a passage in one of our assigned texts. I leave it to you which assignment you wish to do first. Although there are deadlines for the two papers -- midnight Saturday, October 7, for the first one; midnight Saturday, November 25, for the second one -- I encourage you to do these assignments when it is convenient for you from now right up to the deadline, the earlier the better.

For the purposes of this assignment, a precis is an argumentative paraphrase, it is rather like a short straightforward book report, but one in which you are recapitulating in your own words what you take to be the key argumentative moves made in a short passage of your own choosing from one of our assigned texts. Do not attempt to summarize the argument of an entire long work, choose a specific passage you can get a handle on in just two or so pages. Also, please understand, I am not asking you to make an argument about the text, I am not asking you to explain why you think an argument is effective or not, I am not asking you to argue with the author: I am asking you to identify the terms of the argument the author is making as you understand them. The simplest way to describe what the precis should involve is to say it will probably identify a thesis or claim in your chosen passage and then observe the reasons, evidence and illustrations (this might include some figurative content) that support that thesis in your view. Depending on the rhetorical skill-set you have at your command, you might also highlight key definitions of terms, anticipations and circumventions of objections, qualifications of claims, unstated warrants (stuff you may remember from studying the Toulmin schema for argument), ethos and pathos moves, implicit premises in enthymemes (stuff you may remember from studying Aristotelian rhetoric), strategies like delayed thesis, modeling listening, preemptive compromise (stuff you may remember from studying Rogerian synthesis or mediation rhetoric). All of these elements are useful in a precis, but a propositional analysis emphasizing relations of entailment between premises and conclusions and relations of empirical support between claims and evidence and data will be the bread and butter of most precises.

For the purposes of this assignment, a figurative analysis is an examination of the way figures and style produce argumentative effects (clarity, memorableness, urgency, pleasure, and so on) in the textual passage you have chosen. It is perfectly natural that a figurative reading would involve the identification and close reading or unpacking of a few key metaphors (whether treated in isolation or in relation to one another) in your passage. But it is useful to recall -- and our readings of both Aristotle and Quintilian later in the term will include foundational and still influential discussions of these topics -- that figurative language includes both tropes (from tropos, or turn, referring to turns of phrase, deviations in sense from literal language) and schemes (which call attention to the materiality of language itself and are often deviations from customary usage or form). Tropes include metaphor -- as I mentioned before -- but also metonymy, synecdoche and irony (what Kenneth Burke called, following Quintilian, the Four Master Tropes, and which every self-respecting rhetorician should know well), and many other delightful deviancies, like paradox, hyperbole, litotes, extended analogy, allegory, and so on. Schemes includes alliteration and assonance (which you may remember from the study of literature), but also onomatopoeia, chiasmus (a personal fave), auxesis, anastrophe, ellipses, and so much more. In lecture last time around I mentioned a book by Richard Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms -- I gave it a looksee and found copies available for ten bucks or so used at Amazon for those eager for a deeper dive.

Friday, September 16, 2016

Monday, September 5, 2016

Donovan and Kennedy Have A Spat

In the notes to Brian Donovan's translation of the "Encomium of Helen," which we will be discussing in lecture Tuesday, mention is made of George Kennedy's slick but perhaps not quite strictly literal translation of section 12. As you can see from my transcription below, this version is indeed more euphonious but the gist is mostly the same where it matters most (or so I would say), but Kennedy has made the rough places smooth if not always in well-warranted ways:

"What cause then prevents the conclusion that Helen similarly, against her will, might have come under the influence of speech, just as if ravished by the force of the mighty? For it was possible to see how the force of persuasion prevails; persuasion has the form of necessity, but it does not have the same power. For speech constrained the soul, persuading it which it persuaded, both to believe the things said and to approve the things done. The persuader, like the constrainer, does the wrong and the persuaded, like the constrained, in speech is wrongly charged."

Mary Beard on Homeric (And Other) Silencing of Women's Words and Deeds



I spoke Thursday of the Iliad's celebration of "words and deeds" (and its concomitant insistence that words ARE deeds) as the delineation of a masculine conception of agency -- I described it rather bluntly as an agency "at once assertive and insertive" you may remember -- a patriarchal conception of agency that would continue to resonate in text after text we read together this term. It is in this spirit that I thought I would direct you to asupplemental text, entirely optional, by Mary Beard (one of the more popular and vital classicists we have going) in which she provides a complementary discussion of a woman's ejection from the space of words and deeds early in Homer's companion epic The Odyssey. Beard's piece connects these questions to contemporary concerns in ways that I hope you are already beginning to think about on your own -- but she also goes on to survey some of the authors (Aristophanes, Ovid) we will be reading in weeks to come (if not always the exact texts of theirs I have chosen to highlight) and even provides a key preview of a late upcoming attraction, our discussion of Hortensia near the end of term. I realize that this course is already reading intensive, but I do like to provide optional supplemental texts for particular purposes for those of you who might find you are getting bitten by the bug of classics/philology/feminism via our readings together.

Our Syllabus

Rhet 103A: Approaches and Paradigms in the History of Rhetorical Theory:
Patriarchal Publicities: Rhetoric, Philosophy, and Satire in Greek and Roman Antiquity

Course Description

Rhetoric was conceived in antiquity as the art of speaking well. But the act of speaking in public was always also a doing of deeds, and even well done it could do you in -- whether one was declaiming in the assemblies and courts of the radical (and radically exclusive) democracies and anti-democracies of the Greek city-states, or drawing up ideal Republics in dreamy discourses among scholars, or engaging in the rough and tumble of state-craft and electioneering in the all too real and corrupt Republic of Rome, or circulating sardonic satires in the shadow of Emperors. In Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Quintilian engagements with and through rhetoric constituted publicities and also delineated critical, deliberative, civic and pedagogical visions of human agencies fraught with inhumanities.

The societies of Greek, Roman, and Christian antiquity were conspicuously patriarchal, they were societies in which Homeric heroes made history and conquered mortality with great words and deeds in an aspirational fantasy of masculine agency; they were horrific rape cultures in which women were conceived as beasts, slaves and dutiful wives, a patriarchy finding perhaps its quintessential expression in the Roman paterfamilias, the authoritarian male head of the household who held the power of life and death over his children, female relatives, and household slaves. But in philosophy and in poetry, in Greek tragedies and in Roman comedies we find glimpses of a considerably richer and more complicated world of gendered relations, erotic imaginations, and human possibilities, we encounter profound anxieties, ambivalences, and resistances to patriarchal practices and prejudices.

Although we will be reading texts in which philosophy declares its opposition to rhetoric's opportunism and deceit, we will read them as rhetorical skirmishes in the politics of truth-telling. Although we will read discourses on civic deliberation, we will read them as anxious testaments to ubiquitous corruption and violence. Although we will be reading orations aspiring to a world of Heroes and of Men, we will read them as brutal reflections on a world in which few were heroes and many were not men. We will be reading works by Aristophanes, Aristotle, Augustine, Marcus and Quintus Cicero, Euripides, Gorgias, Homer, Hortensia, Juvenal, Libanius, Ovid, Petronius, Plato, Quintilian, Sappho, Seneca, Suetonius, Terence, and Thucydides. All of the readings will be available here online.

Instructor: Dale Carrico: dcarrico@sfai.edu, ndaleca@gmail.com
GSIs: Jerilyn Sambrooke: jsambrooke@berkeley.edu; Kuan S Hwa: kuanhwa@berkeley.edu
Course Blogs (I had to clone the blog to accommodate our enrollment):
[Leda] http://patriarchalphilosophistry.blogspot.com
[Castor] http://patriarchalphilosophistrytoo.blogspot.com/
August 25-December 8, 2016, Tuesdays and Thursdays, 3.30-5pm, LeConte Hall, Room 2

Participation/Attendance/In-Class Activities, 15%; Reading Notebook, 25%; Precis, 2-3pp., 15%; Figurative Reading, 2-3pp., 15%; Final Paper, 6pp., 30%. (Rough Basis for Final Grade, subject to contingencies)

Provisional Schedule of Meetings

Week One
Thursday, August 25 | Introduction

Week Two
Tuesday, August 30 | Homer, Books I, II, IX, and XXIV from the Iliad
Thursday, September 1 | A selection of poems by Sappho

Week Three
Tuesday, September 6 | Gorgias, "Encomium of Helen"
Thursday, September 8 | Thucydides, Books I and II from History of the Peloponnesian War

Week Four
Tuesday, September 13 | Thucydides, Books II & The Melian Dialogue from History of the Peloponnesian War
Optional, supplemental reading: Plato Menexenus
Thursday, September 15 | Euripides, Hecuba

Week Five
Tuesday, September 20 | Plato, Apology
Thursday, September 22 | Plato, Protagoras

Week Six
Tuesday, September 27 | Plato, Gorgias
Thursday, September 29 | Plato, Phaedrus

Week Seven
Tuesday, October 4 | Plato, Symposium
Thursday, October 6 | Aristophanes, Wasps 
You should have posted your first short piece, whether your precis or figurative analysis by
Midnight Saturday, October 8.

Week Eight
Tuesday, October 11 | Aristotle, Rhetoric, Book I and Book II and from Topics
Thursday, October 13 | Aristotle, Rhetoric, Book III and from Poetics

Week Nine
Tuesday, October 18 | Marcus Tullius Cicero, Against Verres
Thursday, October 20 | Marcus Tullius Cicero, Against Cataline, Against Antony One and Two

Week Ten
Tuesday, October 25 | Marcus Tullius Cicero, On the Ideal Orator
Thursday, October 27 | Terence, Eunuchus

Week Eleven
Tuesday, November 1 | Seneca, Apocolocyntosis (divi) Claudii
Thursday, November 3 | Suetonius, Caligula

Week Twelve
Tuesday, November 8 | Quintus Tullius Cicero, Commentariolum Petitionis
Thursday, November 10 | Juvenal, Satires I, II, III and X

Week Thirteen
Tuesday, November  15 | Hortensia's Forum Oration to the Second Triumvirate. Quintilian, from Institutio Oratoria: Book I -- Preface, Chapters 1-3; Book III -- Chapters 1-5; Book VI -- Chapter 1; Book VII -- Chapters 8-10; Book VIII -- Chapter 1-3, and also Chapter 6; Book IX -- Chapter 1; Book XII -- Chapter 1
Thursday, November 17 | Libanius, "The Silence of Socrates"

Week Fourteen
Tuesday, November 22 | Gaius Petronius, Satyricon
Thursday, November 24 | Thanksgiving Day Holiday
You should have posted your second short piece, whether your precis or figurative analysis by Midnight Saturday, November 26.

Week Fifteen
Tuesday, November 29 | Augustine, from City of God, Read as much as you like but Books I and XI are the crucial ones for us.
Thursday, December 1 | In-Class Workshop for Final Paper

Week Sixteen/RRR & Final Paper Due
Tuesday, December 6 | Optional Marathon Office Hour Availability
Monday, December 12 | You should have handed in your final paper to the GSI of your discussion section by this date, no later than 3.30 pm.