Shannon Zheng
RHET 103A
8 October 2016
GSI: Kuan / DIS
101
Precis: Hecuba, Agon 1
In Hecuba’s exchange with Odysseus in
the first agon of Hecuba by Euripedes,
Hecuba engages in compelling rhetoric to retain her dignity despite accumulating
tragedies; most recently, the loss of her status as queen, as a result of Troy’s
loss of the Trojan War. Although ultimately unsuccessful in persuading Odysseus against taking Polyxena, Hecuba is able to powerfully renegotiate her disadvantaged
position, class and gender, by leveraging her command of rhetoric to
effectively challenge Odysseus. As a whole, Hecuba
comes to terms with themes of power, sacrifice, and sympathy.
With the death of Achilles, Odysseus
is employed with the task of escorting Polyxena, Hecuba’s daughter and last
surviving child, to be sacrificed at Achilles’ grave, invoking the theme of power.
Upon entering Hecuba’s residence, Odysseus remarks, “Be not forcibly torn from
[Polyxena], nor match they might ‘gainst mine; recognize the limits of they strength,
and the presence of thy trouble. Even in adversity ‘tis wise to yield to
reason’s dictates”. With the task and social location Odysseus commands, Odysseus
arrives at Hecuba’s residence asserting his agenda and expectation of Hecuba to
surrender to his agenda. Through ethos, Odysseus threatens Hecuba with the power
he possesses as a man, his physical power, as well as power through the class privilege
he retains, as a warrior and king. In contrast to the downward mobility of
Hecuba’s career, as a queen to now slave, in addition to her being a woman, inhabiting
perceived limited physical capabilities, Odysseus confidently and forcefully stresses
his individual power. In responding to Odysseus’ claims to power, Hecuba asks
Odysseus to contend with questions she has, to which in Odysseus agreeing to
participate in her questioning, Hecuba is able to employ her power in rhetoric.
Despite the vast grievances and disadvantages she carries, in the tragedies she
has endured and is presently enduring, Hecuba presents a logical, convincing
case against sacrificing Polyxena; Hecuba wages four points in her argument against
Odysseus. Hecuba’s first and second points are exemplary of the theme of
reciprocity while her last third and fourth points emphasizes the theme of sympathy.
Hecuba
cites the time she saved Odysseus from death, as reason as to why he should
reciprocate the favor and save Polyxena from death. “I in my turn now do the
same to thee, and claim the favor then bestowed”. Hecuba saves Odysseus’ life,
when she chooses not to expose Odysseus’ covert identity when she witnesses
Odysseus spying; Hecuba makes the point that Odysseus now has the opportunity
to save Polyxena’s life in the service of Hecuba having saved his life in the
past. Being entrusted with the responsibility of escorting Polyxena, Odysseus
has the power to decide to refuse to escort Polyxena and subsequently help
Polyxena escape death. Further, Hecuba cites the fact Polyxena is wholly
innocent in the proposed transaction. “No! [Polyxena] at least ne’er injured
him. [Achilles] should have demanded Helen as a victim at his tomb, for [Helen]
it was proved his ruin, bringing him to Troy”. Hecuba’s second charge against
Odysseus taking Polyxena, is that it is Helen, not Polyxena, that inspired the
waging of the Trojan War; should there be any justified sacrifice for Achilles’
life, it should be the sacrifice of Helen because it is from Helen being
kidnapped, that the Trojan War ensued, and it is in Achilles’ participation in
the Trojan War, that Achilles is killed.
Through the theme of sympathy,
Hecuba makes her third and fourth points as sympathetic, pathos appeals to Odysseus
because of their shared culture and experience as parents. Hecuba explains, “[f]or
amongst you the self-same law holds good for bond and free alike respecting
bloodshed; such influences as thine will persuade them even though thy words
are weak”. Hecuba references the difference in freedom, Oydsseus’ status as a
citizen while she is a slave, evoking emotive appeals towards their shared
values. Regardless of their differences, their shared experiences from their
culture should inspire Odysseus to be sympathetic because as Hecuba illuminates,
their commitment towards law, justice, and respect for life, should outweigh the
present, rash decision to sacrifice an innocent life. What’s more than their
reverence for innocent life however, is what should be the reverence for the
innocent life of their own kin. Hecuba thus makes the plea, “tear not my child
from my arms, nor slay her” and further, “he to hath children, so that he can
feel for thy sad fate”. Their shared cultural values powerfully shape Hecuba’s
plea, but even more compelling, is their shared, intimate experience as parents
who love their children. Having lost nearly all of her children, Hecuba urges
Odysseus to have sympathy amidst her suffering, by empathizing with her because
he is also a parent.
Despite Hecuba’s cohesive and forceful
arguments, Odysseus rejects Hecuba’s points, from her employing of the themes
of reciprocity and sympathy, committing himself to his agenda, escorting Polyxena
to Achilles’ grave for sacrifice. To Hecuba’s pleas for reciprocity, Odysseus
responds, “Thy life I am prepared to save for the service I received”, and in
concluding, says that Hecuba should “[e]ndure these sorrows; for us [all of
Hellas], if we are wrong in resolving to honor the brave, we shall bring upon
ourselves a charge of ignorance” or “Hellas may prosper and ye may reap the
fruits of such policy”. Odysseus dismisses Hecuba’s points, her claims to reciprocity,
instead reducing the favor and gratitude towards Hecuba only, a gratitude that
is invalid as a reason for saving the life of Hecuba’s daughter. Odysseus concludes
his argument in opposition to Hecuba, as a harsh reality Hecuba must endure for
the sake of a type of justice for their shared culture, collective respect for
and responsibility to Hellas, dismissing the smaller injustice of the sacrifice
of innocent Polyxena.
2 comments:
Shannon,
This is an accurate depiction of the exchange between Odysseus and Hecuba but I hesitate to say that it deeply clarifies their interaction any more than the raw text does as it stands alone. While you help us with identifying Hecuba's appeal to sympathy, or Odysseus' assertion of power in order to differentiate himself from Hecuba's status, your writing unnecessarily leads us into vague conceptual moments: "the theme of power" or "the theme of reciprocity" is too vague to tell us what is being demanded, by whom, and by what logic. When you go into your close reading of the passage, you give us a clearer vision, but you still need to dig deeper and give us a more delineated map. Give us this map earlier in the précis.
Post a Comment