FA: The Oration Against Cataline
In Cicero’s “The First Oration
Against Cataline”, Cicero employs the extended metaphor of domesticity to draw
from the figures of the private-house and parenthood, the significance of domestic
morality, a set of common values that Cataline lacks and that founds and strengthens
the republic. By invoking the figure of the private-house, Cicero articulates the
private household as a site where parents raise domestic morality, to which citizens
can successfully participate to uphold the integrity of the republic. Through ethos
and the figure of parenthood, Cicero invests himself with the authority of a
fatherly figure seeking to preserve the integrity of the mother-country, Italy
against Cataline’s abuses.
The extended metaphor of domesticity
invokes the figure of the private household as a sacred site that is immune to Cataline’s
attempts to taint domestic values with his criminal activity. In addressing
Cataline’s attempts at hiding his own past criminal history, Cicero writes, “For
what is there, O Cataline… if private houses can not conceal the voice of [Cataline’s]
conspiracy within their walls-if everything is seen and displayed?” (Paragraph
7, Line 1-3). Cicero claims that almost nothing can seek to obstruct or lessen
the severity of Cataline’s crimes. Through Cicero’s use of a loaded question,
Cicero commands an authoritative vantage; Cicero frames his speech, beginning
with “For what is there” and concluding with “if everything is seen and
displayed?” to emphasize the magnitude of Cataline’s crimes, assuming that there
is no place for Cataline to escape to or seek protection behind, from Cataine
and Cataline’s villainous actions. Cicero’s claim is further emphasized by
Cicero’s use of the metaphor of the private house, where Cicero illustrates metaphorically
that the private-house cannot contain Cataline’s evil, conspiratorial words and
deeds within its walls. Although as a building, the private household contains
walls to maintain its infrastructure, when the figure of the private household is
invoked under Cataline’s name, Cataline’s private household conversely holds a
transparent, porous construction. The figure of the private house, despite its
walls, can neither contain, bear Cataline’s secrets, nor refuse outside exposure,
shield Cataline from conspicuousness, because of the gravity of Cataline’s evil
actions. Rather than the integrity of the private household, “[Cataline’s]
house [is] a shrine as it were of [Cataline’s] crimes” (Paragraph 22, Line
4-5). In contrast to the private household, Cataline’s house is characterized
as the opposite of a site for sacred, moral values, as that of which are raised
up in domestic life. Cataline’s house conversely serves as an unredeemable,
corrupt site since Cataline violates good, domestic values.
The metaphor of the private-household is
sacred and unable to contain Cataline’s corruption because the
private-household is characterized as a site for moral upbringing, a domestic morality
that Cataline lacks. Whereas the metaphor of the private-house is transparent
when referring to Cataline’s own private-house, when Cataline sought to avenge
Cicero, Cicero is able to, “strengthe[n] and fortif[y] [Cicero’s own] house
with a stronger guard” (Paragraph 9, Line 13-14) “not with a public guard, but
by [Cicero’s] own private diligence” (Paragraph 10, Line 15-16). The metaphor of
the private house figuratively is able to protect Cicero from Cataline’s
aggressions precisely because of the differences in their moral positions. The
protection of the house is figuratively afforded to Cicero, rather than Cataline,
since Cicero possesses righteousness, authority from Cicero’s high moral
position, commitment to domestic morality. Like a parent, Cicero works to strengthen
and fortify his household because he possesses strength from his moral
position, such as that of a heteronormative fatherly figure commanding and
preserving the household. Cicero invests himself, through ethos, as a parental
figure by purporting to hold the righteous vision for the future of the
republic by disassociating Cataline from subscribing to the morals of the common
citizen as well as in condemning and punishing Cateline to preserve the integrity
of the republic.
The figure of parenthood in the
extended metaphor of domesticity emboldens Cicero’s command of ethos by
allegorizing Cicero’s vantage as that of a fatherly figure seeking justice for
the Italian people. Cicero says, “If your parents
feared and hated you, and if you could by no means pacify the, you would, I
think, depart somewhere out of their sight. Now your country, which is the
common parent of all of us, hates and fears [Cataline]...” (Paragraph 15, Line
16-18). From the vantage of Cicero, along with the ethos Cicero commands in
wanting the best for the country of Italy, Cicero is likened to the position of
a fatherly figure as disapproving of Cataline’s criminal history, like that of
which Cicero metaphorically says, is also commanded by the parent,
mother-country of Italy. Cicero’s
ethos as a parental figure is further elaborated as he scolds Cataline for
Cataline’s inability to command common, domestic morality. “What brand of
domestic baseness is not stamped upon your life?” (Paragraph 12, Line 3-5). The
loaded, question Cicero employs further provides Cicero with a fatherly authority
and emphasizes Cataline’s lack of domestic morality.
Since
Cataline does not hold a position of high domestic morality, Cataline’s metaphorical
private-household is transparent and porous, unable to contain Cataline’s words
and deeds because Cataline lacks the domestic, morality. As a result of Cataline’s low domestic, moral position, Cicero
employs the figures of the household and parenthood, to emphasize through the
extended metaphor of domesticity, the responsibility of Cicero and the
republic, to condemn and punish Cataline for Cataline’s corruption since the republic
draws its strength and foundation upon its domestic values.
No comments:
Post a Comment