In E.P. Coleridge’s translation of Euripides’ Hecuba, the first agon provides a glimpse into the desperation and despair of the
former Queen of Troy as she is held captive by Agamemnon. When she is informed
that her daughter, Polyxena, will be sacrificed over the tomb of Achilles as
tribute for the pains of war, Hecuba begins a series of rhetorical appeals in
an attempt to save her. Immediately, as she’s confronted with Odysseus and his demands
to take Polyxena, Hecuba begins her plea. She implores Odysseus to remember the
grace and mercy she employed when she saved his life; Odysseus, acknowledging
her kindness, does not budge. In a lengthy speech, Hecuba then begins to appeal
to the logic of the decree. She demands to know the “cleverness” the deciding
group used to come to this decision, and whether or not their personal opinions
(she may believe that Odysseus, individually, doesn’t believe Polyxena should
die) were overridden by “duty” to “slay a human victim.”
She continues by asserting that the “sacrifice of oxen more
befits” the situation than the murder of her daughter. Extrapolating from that
original point (with the understanding that the sacrifice of a human will most
likely be necessary), she then begins to situate her daughter amongst other
women she deems more fitting for death. If the qualification of the sacrifice
is she who has caused the most pain, Hecuba asserts that Helen, then, must be
the one to die; Helen, in many ways, was much more directly correlated to the
death of Achilles than Polyxena ever was. If we are to follow this logic,
according to Hecuba, then Helen should suffer, “for she it was that proved his
ruin.” If the qualification of the sacrifice, however, is based on beauty, then
Hecuba provides another logical alternative. Polyxena, according to Hecuba, is
not the most beautiful, by any means, “for the daughter of Tyndareus was fairer
than all womankind.”
Hecuba then returns to her original argument: that Odysseus,
essentially, owes her for the mercy she had once displayed to him. She explains
her sadness, her despair, and her destitution: Polyxena “is my only joy,” she
says, and “in her I forget my sorrows.” She implores Odysseus to understand the
love of a mother, especially in the context of the devastation she and her
people have just endured. She requests that Odysseus return to his camp and
speak with his comrades, “saying how hateful a thing it is to slay women who at
first ye spared out of pity” – again, this time more subtly, reminding Odysseus
of her previous actions. One of the final lines of her speech, however, applies
the theme of common law to her rhetorical argument: “For amongst you,” Hecuba
says, “the self-same law holds good for bond and free alike respecting
bloodshed.” After previously using her status as a downtrodden captive to her
advantage and arguing that Odysseus and his camp should spare her daughter,
Hecuba now invokes a higher moral law to try to assert that status matters none
when it comes to human bloodshed. Realizing that her previous rhetorical
efforts may not prove to be fruitful, she “levels the playing field,” so to
speak, by imploring her captors to see her humanity above all else.
1 comment:
Mattingly,
This is a good thorough walk-through of Hecuba's appeals to Odysseus; you are keen to show us that her failure with one argument leads her to persevere by other argumentative means. It might have been helpful to also include a clearer overview of how all these types of appeals fit together, if at all. In their totality are they merely an expression of desperation? Or do they have some logical quality that makes sense in the order in which they appear? Your colloquial use of "[leveling] the playing field" needs unpacking; do you mean Hecuba's appeal to disregard status is a democratic act? Or is it to invoke a more fundamental Greek law about humanity? This is important, because her earlier appeals via the laws of Xenia are in fact a code of conduct, but her appeal to equal status is not as clear.
Post a Comment